Friendly ping. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:17 AM Chris Cunningham <chcunning...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:13 AM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2/26/2019 10:18 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Chris Cunningham >> > <chcunning...@chromium.org <mailto:chcunning...@chromium.org>> wrote: >> > >> > I'm fine to do either. James, do you still prefer to skip the later >> > headers if this breaks some old ogm files? >> > >> > >> > James, friendly ping >> >> Yes, i'd prefer if we skip any superfluous parameter header that shows >> up before the first data packet. >> The return value of ff_codec_get_id() should also be checked to not >> propagate AV_CODEC_ID_NONE, which was the source of this issue. >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > Renewing request to apply for this patch. > > The alternate route of identifying/skipping the bad packets was more > difficult than expected (https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/13593/). > James signed on this approach instead. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
