On 21.03.2019 13:31, Nicolas George wrote:
Maksym Veremeyenko (12019-03-21):
i just extrapolated your main statement *The work was removed because the
library is 100% closed source and userland.* that should be applied to any
parts of ffmpeg... or not?
Please stop being shifty: what parts of FFmpeg precisely are you
suggesting to remove?
i am just trying to get attention on way and reason of how code was
removed and floating reasons from to remove...
somebody says it was removed because of *library is 100% closed source
and userland.*, somebody says it because license violation case,
somebody just blame NewTek.
it was applied to code without any strong objection, patches that
implement runtime-library loading was rejected... and now: *lets drop it!*
--
Maksym Veremeyenko
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
