2019-02-15 0:13 GMT+01:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:36 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> No, this entire mess with duplicated ff_ symbols is specifically to >> >>> avoid having to include it in the ABI. >> >> >> >> But old libavcodec does not work with new libavutil now or am I wrong? >> > >> > Is that really a thing we expect or advertise to work? It does not seem >> > sane and I'd expect a lot of other things to explode. >> >> We don't "advertise" it but it is certainly expected from any half-sane >> project. > > Its not a problem in any "normal" case. No ff_ symbols are exported, > so dynamic linking would never use it. > What might not work in the future is mixing static libraries of > different versions, but anyone that does something like that is truely > insane anyway.
That may be reasonable. Thank you, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
