2019-02-14 18:21 GMT+01:00, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:51 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Am 14.02.2019 um 13:39 schrieb Timo Rothenpieler <g...@videolan.org>: >> > >> > ffmpeg | branch: master | Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org> | >> > Fri Feb 8 22:47:01 2019 +0100| >> > [15c6390139096b7e7634bf0f6aaab1cd8b3aa509] | committer: Timo >> > Rothenpieler >> > >> > avutil/cuda_check: avoid pointlessly exporting same symbol from two >> > libraries >> > >> >> http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/ffmpeg.git/?a=commit;h=15c6390139096b7e7634bf0f6aaab1cd8b3aa509 >> > --- >> > >> > libavcodec/Makefile | 6 +++--- >> > libavcodec/cuda_check.c | 1 - >> > libavutil/Makefile | 2 +- >> >> > libavutil/cuda_check.c | 45 >> > --------------------------------------------- >> >> Apart from breaking compilation doesn’t this also break ABI? >> > > No, this entire mess with duplicated ff_ symbols is specifically to > avoid having to include it in the ABI.
But old libavcodec does not work with new libavutil now or am I wrong? In any case, shouldn't the function have another name if it is static now? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
