On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 11:22, Gyan <ffm...@gyani.pro> wrote: > On 26-01-2019 05:54 AM, Meredydd Luff wrote: > Locally, I see that tpad does offset > the PTS of the input. Apologies, yes, I misspoke in the original email. That's what I get for submitting something a couple of weeks after writing it and assuming I still remembered the context correctly. Sorry for making you check :-/
> I do see a bug related to the PTS for the > generated frames, What bug to you see? I see correct PTS on current master when running a simple file-to-file test. > In any case, tpad is meant to be the counterpart to adelay; better to > patch it than add a new filter. Roger. In that case, I guess the question is whether the issue I described in another email is best addressed by having a one-in-one-out buffer inside tpad (like the buffer inside adelay) or by something else. This is my first time messing with the innards of ffmpeg, so I'm happy to be steered... Meredydd _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
