lör 2018-12-22 klockan 15:54 +0000 skrev Matthew Fearnley: > > On 22 Dec 2018, at 12:15, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > > > > tor 2018-12-20 klockan 17:48 +0000 skrev Matthew Fearnley: > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 16:30, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu > > > > > > .se> wrote: > > > > > > > > Trivial enough. You could probably roll many or even all of > > > > these > > > > patches together > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I was reluctant to submit so many > > > patches, but I > > > worried at the time that combining them would require an overly > > > long commit > > > message. Maybe I'm being too verbose though... > > > What's the best way to submit a combined patch - from a > > > Patchwork/mailing > > > list perspective? > > > > How large a patch should be is somewhat arbitrary. I tend to try to > > keep each patch related to a single "concept". And of course > > separating > > cosmetic and functional changes > > > > It's mostly the having to have PATCH 3/4 before PATCH 1/4 prompting > > this suggestion. Or maybe rolling them together > > If I roll the patches together (and include the additional > suggestions in PATCH 1), would it be best to just email a new patch, > and have these closed?
If you have a new set of patches then a new thread is best, yes /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
