> On 22 Dec 2018, at 12:15, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > > tor 2018-12-20 klockan 17:48 +0000 skrev Matthew Fearnley: >>>>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 16:30, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: >>> >>> Trivial enough. You could probably roll many or even all of these >>> patches together >> >> Thanks for your feedback. I was reluctant to submit so many patches, but I >> worried at the time that combining them would require an overly long commit >> message. Maybe I'm being too verbose though... >> What's the best way to submit a combined patch - from a Patchwork/mailing >> list perspective? > > How large a patch should be is somewhat arbitrary. I tend to try to > keep each patch related to a single "concept". And of course separating > cosmetic and functional changes > > It's mostly the having to have PATCH 3/4 before PATCH 1/4 prompting > this suggestion. Or maybe rolling them together
If I roll the patches together (and include the additional suggestions in PATCH 1), would it be best to just email a new patch, and have these closed? Still struggling with general procedure here a bit... Thanks for bearing with me. Matthew _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
