In this case , Carl's decision to strip their code from FFmpeg is valid. This is a clear violation of the license terms.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 19:38 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org wrote: > Kyle Schwarz (2018-12-03): > > https://www.newtek.com/blog/introducing-ndi-3-5/ > > > > > ... and we even include FFMPEG for Windows with NDI support for your > convenience, eliminating the hassle of working out how to compile it > yourself. > > That is not how it is supposed to work. If they want to include FFmpeg > for their users' convenience, they have to make their software > LGPL-compatible. > > Because "their users' convenience" is good publicity for them, they have > to pay for it, not us. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
