On 20.10.2018 23:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2018-10-20 23:16 GMT+02:00, Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org>:
On 20.10.2018 23:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2018-10-20 22:46 GMT+02:00, Philip Langdale <phil...@overt.org>:

The big discussion was about the new pixel formats. I would
like to get to a clear conclusion on this otherwise, this patch
series goes nowhere forever

Wouldn't it be an alternative to first commit the patch with P16
and then discuss what the disadvantage is?

How would you tell apart 10 and 12 bit content?

You write it into raw_bits_per_pixel.

You mean bits_per_raw_sample?

To do that in a way that's actually usable we start going back the whole rabbit hole though. It starts with the field missing on frames, and goes on with nothing using it for video at all so far, only for audio, where that kinda setup is actually well supported.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to