Hi, 2018-07-27 8:12 GMT-03:00 Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>: > > NN is different. The exposed software *uses* but does not *generate* the > coefficients. In fact, the meaning of most coefficients is completely > opaque. They are just multiplier and addition constants with no obvious > relationship to reality, other than that they were generated by some > magical process that tells us that statistically (??), this bears > resemblence to some trained form of reality. You want to adjust behaviour > for a defined different outcome? You'll have to retrain. That's all fine, > don't get me wrong, but we need to know how to retrain since it's not > obvious to us. Just tell us what process and what data were used to get the > outcome so that we can get a different outcome if we so choose (that *is* > freedom to modify)? > > Please document (and make available) all such information for the > re-training. We already did it [1] the repo provides all scripts to download the data and run the training and also generates the header with weights readily to use in ffmpeg. When Jean-Baptist raised this issue we worked to provide all the necessary scripts to perform training, reading the replies above, it seems no one is aware of it (not even J-B). Isn't [1] enough? whats is missing then? why no one asked for whatever may be missing in the original email when we provided the link to the repo?
[1] - https://github.com/HighVoltageRocknRoll/sr _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
