On 4/26/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-04-26 13:17 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <j...@itanimul.li>: >> On 2017/06/26 15:09, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> Rationale: >>> - Slower then other encoder >>> - Less configurable >>> - Does not support alpha profile >>> - Does not set interlaced flag >>> - Worse output quality >>> - No need for 2 encoders >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> >>> >> Is there any reason this was not pushed? >> I can't seem to see any argument against it. > > It was shown in the past that this encoder is faster, > more efficient and produces better quality.
Why are you not telling real truth? None of your claims are really true. I wonder why. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
