On 2018/04/26 12:26, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2018-04-26 13:17 GMT+02:00, Josh de Kock <j...@itanimul.li>:
On 2017/06/26 15:09, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Rationale:
- Slower then other encoder
- Less configurable
- Does not support alpha profile
- Does not set interlaced flag
- Worse output quality
- No need for 2 encoders
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>
Is there any reason this was not pushed?
I can't seem to see any argument against it.
It was shown in the past that this encoder is faster,
more efficient and produces better quality.
I don't know when this has changed.
Ok, there was some discussion on IRC, so I was unsure. I will look into
it again.
--
Josh
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
