On 2018/04/25 23:18, Nicolas George wrote:
Josh de Kock (2018-04-25):If anything, this should have never been added and a suitable external library should have been picked.This opinion should have been expressed three years ago. It was decided then that lavf deserved a HTTP server. It is done.
If I was part of this project three years ago, I most certainly would have done so. It's also not impossible, nor irrational to be removing code which doesn't fit or could be written better if an alternative is provided, the need was never there or removal can otherwise be justified.
-- Josh _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
