On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:46:09 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Stephan Holljes (2018-04-24): > > The consensus seems to be that there are more disadvantages in using > > the http server of libavformat than there are advantages. > > I completely disagree. There is no point in having the HTTP server in > libavformat if it cannot be used to implement exactly that kind of > thing. Implementing ffserver with it is just the test bed that it > requires to become mature. > > The HTTP server in libavformat was accepted three years ago, and you > worked hard for it. Do not let people tell you it was for nothing. They > had their chance to discuss this three years ago. Sunk cost fallacy, and future maintenance overhead. > > This arose partly out of the discussion that there is no way to get a > > connected peer's address through the public API (as the filedescriptor > > is hidden in private structs). > > Well, then, let us add the functions that are needed in the public API. > It does not seem that difficult to design. > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
