On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:21:30 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> wm4 (2018-04-18): > > Which applications (in context of FFmpeg) need to detect empty UDP > > packets? Which applications would be broken by a trivial patch in the > > UDP code? > > One last time: this is public API: any existing application can rely on > it. Including unpublished applications. This patch breaks them. This is > the reason it was rejected then, this is the reason is is unacceptable > now. Like I said, this didn't even work. And the EOF behavior was changed anyway, how is that not an API break? That change also broke a whole lot of other things, so I can't quite understand your argument here. In fact, you should have rejected the EOF change patch which you pushed yourself. Wasn't this completely unacceptable? By the way, I'm trying to understand your arguments. But it's not easy because you never explain them and you just respond with general platitudes. I can't read your mind. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
