2018-03-05 12:37 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>:
> On 3/5/18, Vasile Toncu <vasile.to...@tremend.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the review. I've made changes according to your guidance.
>>
>> It would be great to know if the community will go on with our intention
>> of adding reinterlace as a alternative for tinterlace.
>>
>> That being said, here is the new patch.
>
> As already said, this is not acceptable.
>
> There is no point in having 2 filters with near same funcionality.

If you consider the new filter ok, the existing filter will be removed
in the same push. I believe sending only the new filter makes
reviewing easier.

Please comment, Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to