2018-02-28 9:48 GMT+01:00 Jerome Borsboom <jerome.borsb...@carpalis.nl>:
>> Is this expected to pass the two fate tests for VC-1 interlaced, >> fate-vc1_sa10143 and fate-vc1_ilaced_twomv? (It doesn't on >> my system, all output frames are different.) If not, could you >> explain why not? They are expected to change for compliant decoders. > I have a feeling that the software decoder in FFmpeg is not > fully compliant with the VC-1 spec. Your suspicion is correct, the software decoder is not compliant, fate tests are not relevant for this use-case. I believe the mailing list archive contains the correct values but it is simpler to wait for Hendrik to confirm. > The loopfilter, as currently implemented, may be wrong > for interlaced content. I am still investigating this issue. This also sounds correct, could be checked with the reference decoder and -skip_loop_filter. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
