On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jerome Borsboom <jerome.borsb...@carpalis.nl> wrote: >> Is this expected to pass the two fate tests for VC-1 interlaced, >> fate-vc1_sa10143 and fate-vc1_ilaced_twomv? (It doesn't on my system, all >> output frames are different.) If not, could you explain why not? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Mark > > > I have a feeling that the software decoder in FFmpeg is not fully compliant > with the VC-1 spec. The loopfilter, as currently implemented, may be wrong > for interlaced content. I am still investigating this issue. > > As far as I can see, there are no visual differences between the output of > the software decoded and the hardware decoded images. > >
If you have the ability, you could compare the test hash output to D3D11/DXVA2 decoding on Windows. Or I could post those frame hashes later when I get back home for comparison purposes. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
