On 1/16/2018 5:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:15:00PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 1/11/2018 6:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Georg, do you want to maintain vf_vidstabtransform.c ?
If not, who wants to maintain vf_vidstabtransform.c ?
If noone then iam not sure who will test or apply this, i think many
dont have the dependancy installed ...
I assume the author hasn't gotten back yet. Can anyone else test and apply
this?
Anyone?
If noone else cares about maintaining this ...
then there is one radical but simple solution ...
post a patch that adds you to MAINTAINERs for the file.
Anyone could object yes, but then that person should at least review and apply
the vf_vidstabtransform.c patch
I have no interest or business maintaining the library wrappers.
In the commit history for these files, I see Paul Mahol, Clément Bœsch and
you as committers among those active. Timothy Gu has signed off as well, but
I don't know if he's active.
So, someone among the above could take a look?
Please correct me if i misunderstand but IIUC you basically say
you wont review patches for vf_vidstabtransform (that is what maintaining is)
but you want other people to review your patches for vf_vidstabtransform
I won't review patches for vidstab because I can't. There is an open
ticket which has a simple fix which I noticed, applied & tested. But I'm
not well-versed in the internals of vidstab to be a competent maintainer
for all other patches, as they may come up.
I believe you suggested to propose myself for maintainership *as a ruse*
to get someone to review my patch and not in earnest. If you were, it
would be insincere for me to go through with it.
I can vouch that the patch works at my end, and if that's not enough, it
will still need to be tested/reviewed by someone else.
I can propose myself as a maintainer for docs if you are amenable.
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
