On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:15:00PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote: > > On 1/11/2018 6:16 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>>> > >>>>Georg, do you want to maintain vf_vidstabtransform.c ? > >>>> > >>>>If not, who wants to maintain vf_vidstabtransform.c ? > >>>> > >>>>If noone then iam not sure who will test or apply this, i think many > >>>>dont have the dependancy installed ... > >>> > >>>I assume the author hasn't gotten back yet. Can anyone else test and apply > >>>this? > >> > >>Anyone? > > > >If noone else cares about maintaining this ... > >then there is one radical but simple solution ... > >post a patch that adds you to MAINTAINERs for the file. > > > >Anyone could object yes, but then that person should at least review and > >apply > >the vf_vidstabtransform.c patch > > I have no interest or business maintaining the library wrappers. > > In the commit history for these files, I see Paul Mahol, Clément Bœsch and > you as committers among those active. Timothy Gu has signed off as well, but > I don't know if he's active. > > So, someone among the above could take a look?
Please correct me if i misunderstand but IIUC you basically say you wont review patches for vf_vidstabtransform (that is what maintaining is) but you want other people to review your patches for vf_vidstabtransform Thats ok of course, no question, but developers might prioritize patches from people who themselfs help reviewing others work. Its a volunteer project after all so it depends on volunteers ... Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
