> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf > Of Carl Eugen Hoyos > Sent: November 26, 2017 9:25 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg- > de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] AMD external header > > 2017-11-27 3:15 GMT+01:00 Mironov, Mikhail > <mikhail.miro...@amd.com>: > > > I will skip all arguments, you already read them. > > That's great, but I believe you forgot to add the fourth option.
I just wanted to start a discussion. Please state what is fourth option? Though, I put it as a policy which is slightly different from option. > > Also, imo you have not really explained which users would have an > advantage if FFmpeg includes the AMD header. It is more a question to people who included NVidia headers. It was for convenience, isn't it? Are you saying that there is a difference and it is based on easy access of the header? > > Carl Eugen > (who has never used any hardware encoder) > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel Thanks, Mikhail _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
