2017-10-31 17:52 GMT+01:00 Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: > On 31/10/17 16:34, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>> We're not bundling entire 3rd party libs in-tree here, just >> API headers for system/driver APIs. > > What exactly would the policy be, then? > > "External headers for a system/driver API may be included in tree > if it makes building with support for this feature easier for users" > would cover pretty much everything. > > I'm definitely against a free-for-all where libmfx, V4L2, etc. all > get included. Could you elaborate? I apparently miss something. Why would anybody want to put a libmfx or v4l2 header into the FFmpeg codebase? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
