On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:26 AM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/27/2017 2:45 AM, Paras Chadha wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Paras Chadha <paraschadh...@gmail.com> > > --- > > All other FITS patches need to be applied before this one. > > > > tests/fate/demux.mak | 3 +- > > tests/fate/fits.mak | 57 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-32 | 6 ++++ > > tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-64 | 6 ++++ > > tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-blank_bitpix32 | 6 ++++ > > tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-ext_data_min_max | 6 ++++ > > 6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-32 > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-64 > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-blank_bitpix32 > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-ext_data_min_max > > Could you look at the current tests' failures first? > Yes, thanks for telling. I am looking into them. > > http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831190621&slot=x > 86_32-msvc12-windows-native > http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831131711&slot=x > 86_64-msvc12-windows-native > http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831182302&slot=x > 86_32-mingw-w64-dll-windows-native > > The mingw x86_32 one seems to be related to the usage of floating point > math in the decoder (x87 vs sse). No idea what's wrong with MSVC, but > it's failing in both x86_64 and x86_32 there. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > -- Paras Chadha _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
