On 8/27/2017 2:45 AM, Paras Chadha wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paras Chadha <paraschadh...@gmail.com>
> ---
> All other FITS patches need to be applied before this one.
> 
>  tests/fate/demux.mak                    |  3 +-
>  tests/fate/fits.mak                     | 57 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-32        |  6 ++++
>  tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-64        |  6 ++++
>  tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-blank_bitpix32   |  6 ++++
>  tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-ext_data_min_max |  6 ++++
>  6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-32
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-bitpix-64
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-blank_bitpix32
>  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/fitsdec-ext_data_min_max

Could you look at the current tests' failures first?

http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831190621&slot=x86_32-msvc12-windows-native
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831131711&slot=x86_64-msvc12-windows-native
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170831182302&slot=x86_32-mingw-w64-dll-windows-native

The mingw x86_32 one seems to be related to the usage of floating point
math in the decoder (x87 vs sse). No idea what's wrong with MSVC, but
it's failing in both x86_64 and x86_32 there.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to