On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 21:34:26 +0200 Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote:
> Am 02.07.17 um 16:17 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > > On 7/2/17, Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote: > >> Am 01.07.17 um 22:23 schrieb Paul B Mahol: > >>> This is native layout of this codec. > >> > >> From where is that definition? > > > > See how samples are stored in raw buffers. > > The raw buffers are our own construct and as such hardly an argument for that. > If you mean that in the bitstream the most inner loop iterates over the > samples > of a given block of a given channel then, well, one might argue that planer is > native... > > > > Many codecs do not do interleaving and that work is left to another > > library. > > Sound like a good way to handle it. > > However, I think we can let the user decide what output format he likes, don't > we? So I am ok with adding planer output format next to interleaved - I do not > follow you on just replacing it (assuming the former is true). I'd also be ok > with defining planer output to be the default in that case. We've changed the output format of decoders before. The user can't expect a specific format. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
