On 7/4/17, Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote: > Am 02.07.17 um 16:17 schrieb Paul B Mahol: >> On 7/2/17, Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote: >>> Am 01.07.17 um 22:23 schrieb Paul B Mahol: >>>> This is native layout of this codec. >>> >>> From where is that definition? >> >> See how samples are stored in raw buffers. > > The raw buffers are our own construct and as such hardly an argument for > that. > If you mean that in the bitstream the most inner loop iterates over the > samples > of a given block of a given channel then, well, one might argue that planer > is > native... > > >> Many codecs do not do interleaving and that work is left to another >> library. > > Sound like a good way to handle it. > > However, I think we can let the user decide what output format he likes, > don't > we? So I am ok with adding planer output format next to interleaved - I do > not > follow you on just replacing it (assuming the former is true). I'd also be > ok > with defining planer output to be the default in that case. > > -Thilo > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
I already dropped the patch. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
