On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:09:04 +0100, Matthias Troffaes wrote: > > This maximum value is no longer correct. > It's correct as far as I can tell. From the code:
Sorry, you're right and I'm wrong. I missed the change to int64. > > Just wondering: Isn't this also useful for a slideshow-like > > transition/fade, not just for motion blur? (I'm saying: If so, the user > > needs to know.) > > Good point, one could use it that way too, yes. I don't think it's > essential to the patch, but I'd be happy to submit a follow-on patch > to mention this use as well. Yes, because "motion blur" is quite abstract to me. I used the previously available filter(s) to "blend", i.e. blend "over" from one image to another. On the time scale, that's still a blur, but a blur is not what comes to mind visually. Moritz _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
