On 5/16/2017 5:12 PM, Tomas Härdin wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 15:42 -0300, James Almer wrote: >> On 5/16/2017 3:13 PM, Tomas Härdin wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I got a question from Diego via IRC about what license cinepakenc.c >>> actually has, since the first commit message just has a message >>> by"Rl" >>> saying that I said it was OK but with no appropriately signed >>> message >>> from me. So I'm posting this just to clarify things: >>> >>> I consent to the original license placed on cinepakenc.c on Wed Jan >>> 22 >>> 11:12:11 2014 +0100 (commit >>> 59dbc36f49db5cfd9d2ad4b00ef2e3336173ee8d). >>> >>> Just for fun I gave the encoder a try, and the output plays just >>> fine >>> on Windows 3.1 in dosbox-x :) >> Nice, i guess :p >> >>> >>> >>> My e-mail address changed a while back since I've changed employer, >>> so >>> MAINTAINERS should be updated to point to this one. I also don't >>> work >>> with MXF any longer, so a new maintainer may be needed for that >> MAINTAINERS doesn't list email addresses, just GPG fingerprints, and >> the >> one listed for you matches the one you're still using today. >> If you have push access you can remove the mxfdec mention, otherwise >> i >> can do that for you. > > Sure. I see I'm listed for lxfdec too, but I think I can still manage > that. And the cinepak encoder has Rl listed so that's covered > > /Tomas
Ok, done then. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
