On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 15:42 -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 5/16/2017 3:13 PM, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I got a question from Diego via IRC about what license cinepakenc.c > > actually has, since the first commit message just has a message > > by"Rl" > > saying that I said it was OK but with no appropriately signed > > message > > from me. So I'm posting this just to clarify things: > > > > I consent to the original license placed on cinepakenc.c on Wed Jan > > 22 > > 11:12:11 2014 +0100 (commit > > 59dbc36f49db5cfd9d2ad4b00ef2e3336173ee8d). > > > > Just for fun I gave the encoder a try, and the output plays just > > fine > > on Windows 3.1 in dosbox-x :) > Nice, i guess :p > > > > > > > My e-mail address changed a while back since I've changed employer, > > so > > MAINTAINERS should be updated to point to this one. I also don't > > work > > with MXF any longer, so a new maintainer may be needed for that > MAINTAINERS doesn't list email addresses, just GPG fingerprints, and > the > one listed for you matches the one you're still using today. > If you have push access you can remove the mxfdec mention, otherwise > i > can do that for you.
Sure. I see I'm listed for lxfdec too, but I think I can still manage that. And the cinepak encoder has Rl listed so that's covered /Tomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
