On 4/5/2017 2:49 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 16 germinal, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : >>> I don't think it would cause any problems for the users in practice. >>> But we can also remove the function alltogether from the release, so >>> anybody who want's to use the function (with the new name) will only >>> have to check for a single version number. > >> Fine by me. The thing didn't even get its own bump or APIChanges >> now that i look at it, so it might as well not exist. >> It would hardly be the worst "breakage" we've gone through. > > I think removing the function from the release branch (before > actual release if possible) and renaming it in master is a good > solution. Thanks, Marton, for thinking of it. > > Steven, would you be fine with it? > > Michael? > > Regards,
Make sure to add a line in APIChanges when you do. Maybe also a version bump. In master of course. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
