Le sextidi 16 germinal, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > > I don't think it would cause any problems for the users in practice. > > But we can also remove the function alltogether from the release, so > > anybody who want's to use the function (with the new name) will only > > have to check for a single version number.
> Fine by me. The thing didn't even get its own bump or APIChanges > now that i look at it, so it might as well not exist. > It would hardly be the worst "breakage" we've gone through. I think removing the function from the release branch (before actual release if possible) and renaming it in master is a good solution. Thanks, Marton, for thinking of it. Steven, would you be fine with it? Michael? Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
