2017-03-29 9:43 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:31:57AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-03-28 17:31 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>:
>> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:51:54AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> >> ---
>> >> doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++
>> >> libavutil/avutil.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> >> libavutil/utils.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> libavutil/version.h | 2 +-
>> >> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'll start pushing that patchset tomorrow if I see no objection.
>>
>> > +#define av_4cc2str(fourcc)
>> > av_fourcc_make_string((char[AV_FOURCC_MAX_STRING_SIZE]){0}, fourcc)
>>
>> Sorry, I really don't understand:
>> If the preferred name for this function is "av_4cc2str", why not name
>> it av_4cc2str()?
>>
>
> I don't understand your question: are you asking why there is a macro
> and a function with different names?
Yes, why is a function with the preferred name not sufficient?
Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
