On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:31:57AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-03-28 17:31 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:51:54AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >> ---
> >>  doc/APIchanges      |  4 ++++
> >>  libavutil/avutil.h  | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>  libavutil/utils.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  libavutil/version.h |  2 +-
> >>  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >
> > I'll start pushing that patchset tomorrow if I see no objection.
> 
> > +#define av_4cc2str(fourcc) 
> > av_fourcc_make_string((char[AV_FOURCC_MAX_STRING_SIZE]){0}, fourcc)
> 
> Sorry, I really don't understand:
> If the preferred name for this function is "av_4cc2str", why not name
> it av_4cc2str()?
> 

I don't understand your question: are you asking why there is a macro and
a function with different names?

BTW, I'm renaming the macro av_4cc2str() to av_fourcc2str() as it seems
more people prefer that name.

-- 
Clément B.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to