On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> this gives better frequency response >>>>>> >>>>>> update swresample fate and other fates >>>>>> that depend on resampling >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> libswresample/resample.c | 14 +-- >>>>>> tests/fate/libswresample.mak | 276 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>>>>> tests/ref/acodec/roqaudio | 2 +- >>>>>> tests/ref/acodec/s302m | 6 +- >>>>>> tests/ref/lavf/dv_fmt | 8 +- >>>>>> tests/ref/lavf/gxf | 8 +- >>>>>> tests/ref/lavf/mxf | 12 +- >>>>>> 7 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Test case, from 44100 to 705600 (16*44100) >>>>> ffmpeg -filter_complex "aevalsrc='if(n-300,0,1)', >>>>> aresample=osr=705600:filter_size=16" -f f32le - | ./freq-resp > >>>>> freq-resp.txt >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> gnuplot result attached >>>> >>>> ping >>> >>> I will push this tomorrow if no one object >>> >>> thanks >> >> Pushed > > > This seems to have tripped up fate on some boxes, ie. here: > http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170308111534&slot=x86_64-netbsd-gcc46
Should be fixed at https://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=fe57bf7cd6ac8ffd8bcc398d50150cab1e55f84c Thank's _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
