On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> this gives better frequency response >>>>> >>>>> update swresample fate and other fates >>>>> that depend on resampling >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> libswresample/resample.c | 14 +-- >>>>> tests/fate/libswresample.mak | 276 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>>>> tests/ref/acodec/roqaudio | 2 +- >>>>> tests/ref/acodec/s302m | 6 +- >>>>> tests/ref/lavf/dv_fmt | 8 +- >>>>> tests/ref/lavf/gxf | 8 +- >>>>> tests/ref/lavf/mxf | 12 +- >>>>> 7 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Test case, from 44100 to 705600 (16*44100) >>>> ffmpeg -filter_complex "aevalsrc='if(n-300,0,1)', >>>> aresample=osr=705600:filter_size=16" -f f32le - | ./freq-resp > >>>> freq-resp.txt >>>> >>>> >>>> gnuplot result attached >>> >>> ping >> >> I will push this tomorrow if no one object >> >> thanks > > Pushed
This seems to have tripped up fate on some boxes, ie. here: http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20170308111534&slot=x86_64-netbsd-gcc46 - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
