On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:31:32PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:23:15 +0100 > u-9...@aetey.se wrote: > > > Did the project (who?) ever make a general decision about Cinepak > > or delegate to wm4 to represent the project's stance? > > > > I question her/his tone, not the policy, but what is the latter > > when not refracted through your, wm4's or someone else's interpretation? > > > > The design decision you refer to I would love to read. What I have > > seen on the ffmpeg.org did not say "decoders shall not produce multiple > > pixel formats". > > Before you get too obsessed with me, I have never represented anything, > or intended to represent. I merely contributed my own opinion about > these patches. I have not more powers than Paul Mahol or Ronald Bultje > (if anything, I have less powers than them).
It is nice of you to say this. Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Rune _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
