On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:19:06AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:08 AM, <u-9...@aetey.se> wrote: > > > You did not have to pay attention to the patch, given your limited > > understanding of the matter > > > And this is a CoC [1] violation, please don't do that again.
Actually what I wrote is: > > You did not have to pay attention to the patch, given your limited > > understanding of the matter (which _you_ stated repeatedly) I am sorry for saying this. Pointing to one's behaviour is correct, presenting it as one's inherent quality is not. I did wrong. Indeed that person did not state her/his limited understanding nor did this repeatedly. What was repeated was erroneous technical comments about which "native" pixel format Cinepak has. The formulation about understanding I meant to refer to was that of wm4: > I don't know what you're thinking, but that's just wrong. It looks bizarre to me to judge without knowing but this was _not_ a confession of a "limited understanding of the matter". I am sorry for misrepresentation of the statements of wm4! Now Ronald where were you with your policing when the person in question (wm4) repeatedly violated CoC? I point out that your behaviour of selective punishment is most probably not conscious but it is a fact. Regards, Rune _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
