On 1/29/17, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 13:06:13 +0100 > Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > >> Le decadi 10 pluviose, an CCXXV, wm4 a ecrit : >> > Then you should stop moving away from it. The av_frame_make_writable >> > design is superior for multiple reasons, and was intentionally designed >> > this way by an intelligent mind with a lot of API-foresight. >> > >> > If you "move away from it" just like this, you create a major >> > inconsistency as well. >> > >> > I haven't heard a good argument as to why its API is supposed to be >> > better than av_frame_make_writable. >> > >> > I one the other hand delivered a bunch of arguments to which you didn't >> > reply. >> >> Rude again. > > No, it's not rude. > > Maybe you could get technical again, after you've sent only a bunch of > cranky posts complaining about my supposedly bad behavior?
I'm really sick of you two. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
