On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 13:00:38 +0100 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le decadi 10 pluviôse, an CCXXV, wm4 a écrit : > > His 1/2 patch was a strict improvement over the current internal API. > > In particular, it gets it into line with the current > > av_frame_make_writable() API. > > You purposefully ignore the fact, already stated, that moving away from > av_frame_make_writable() was intentional. Then you should stop moving away from it. The av_frame_make_writable design is superior for multiple reasons, and was intentionally designed this way by an intelligent mind with a lot of API-foresight. If you "move away from it" just like this, you create a major inconsistency as well. I haven't heard a good argument as to why its API is supposed to be better than av_frame_make_writable. I one the other hand delivered a bunch of arguments to which you didn't reply. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
