On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:52:48AM +1100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Michael Niedermayer >> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:36:41PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: >> >> --- >> >> libavcodec/dxva2.c | 8 ++++---- >> >> libavcodec/dxva2_internal.h | 2 -- >> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > >> > applied >> > >> > PS: it seems this was posted over a month ago with no reviewes or >> > comments, is some co-maintainer needed for this ? >> > >> > thx >> > >> >> This set was being reviewed on the libav mailing list, it makes no >> sense to review it twice. > > It makes sense to approve or reject patches. Otherwise noone knows > and also patchwork has the status wrong then. > > Furthermore without approval, patches wont neccessarily get applied > and without rejection patches may get applied that someone would have > arguments against. > > So i think the maintainer should reply to patches here with either > a review, an approval or a rejection or something along these lines. > And in that light, was my question about a co-maintainer ...
While review is still on-going, there is no such status to apply. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
