L'octidi 28 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > You didn't answer what's the gain here.
Yes I did: discuss that with Hendrik, Andreas and Clément, not me. > How is this better than keeping the > struct public and letting library users keep accessing its fields normally? > Why are you trying to make libavfilter so different than the rest? We have > scheduled the deprecation and removal of /all/ accessors, and now you want > to add more? I think you did not read the code carefully enough. These accessors, on top of addressing Hendrik, Andreas and Clément's concerns, make the code actually more robust and readable. > If people didn't use lavfi before, they will feel less motivated to do it > now since they can't even expect consistency with lavf or lavc. Once again: consistency is only a means to an end. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
