On 13.12.2016 01:32, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:50:19AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> The arguments of av_reduce are signed, so the cast to uint64_t is misleading.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
>> ---
>>  libavcodec/tiff.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/tiff.c b/libavcodec/tiff.c
>> index 4721e94..12ef419 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/tiff.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/tiff.c
>> @@ -772,9 +772,16 @@ static void set_sar(TiffContext *s, unsigned tag, 
>> unsigned num, unsigned den)
>>      int offset = tag == TIFF_YRES ? 2 : 0;
>>      s->res[offset++] = num;
>>      s->res[offset]   = den;
>> -    if (s->res[0] && s->res[1] && s->res[2] && s->res[3])
>> +    if (s->res[0] && s->res[1] && s->res[2] && s->res[3]) {
>> +        uint64_t num = s->res[2] * (uint64_t)s->res[1];
>> +        uint64_t den = s->res[0] * (uint64_t)s->res[3];
>> +        if (num > INT64_MAX || den > INT64_MAX) {
>> +            num = num >> 1;
>> +            den = den >> 1;
>> +        }
> 
> this can make one of them 0, in fact i think even if they arent 0
> the sample_aspect_ratio can be  after reduce
> should they be checked after all that instead of before ?

I've added a check for !s->avctx->sample_aspect_ratio.den after av_reduce.
The check before is still necessary to prevent sample_aspect_ratio from
becoming negative.

Best regards,
Andreas

>From 3cd8cb663d762bc15694e285ea48cdb8e9abfd4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:43:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tiff: fix overflows when calling av_reduce

The arguments of av_reduce are signed, so the cast to uint64_t is misleading.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
---
 libavcodec/tiff.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/tiff.c b/libavcodec/tiff.c
index 4721e94..7ccda51 100644
--- a/libavcodec/tiff.c
+++ b/libavcodec/tiff.c
@@ -772,9 +772,18 @@ static void set_sar(TiffContext *s, unsigned tag, unsigned num, unsigned den)
     int offset = tag == TIFF_YRES ? 2 : 0;
     s->res[offset++] = num;
     s->res[offset]   = den;
-    if (s->res[0] && s->res[1] && s->res[2] && s->res[3])
+    if (s->res[0] && s->res[1] && s->res[2] && s->res[3]) {
+        uint64_t num = s->res[2] * (uint64_t)s->res[1];
+        uint64_t den = s->res[0] * (uint64_t)s->res[3];
+        if (num > INT64_MAX || den > INT64_MAX) {
+            num = num >> 1;
+            den = den >> 1;
+        }
         av_reduce(&s->avctx->sample_aspect_ratio.num, &s->avctx->sample_aspect_ratio.den,
-                  s->res[2] * (uint64_t)s->res[1], s->res[0] * (uint64_t)s->res[3], INT32_MAX);
+                  num, den, INT32_MAX);
+        if (!s->avctx->sample_aspect_ratio.den)
+            s->avctx->sample_aspect_ratio = (AVRational) {0, 1};
+    }
 }
 
 static int tiff_decode_tag(TiffContext *s, AVFrame *frame)
-- 
2.10.2

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to