On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:08:37 +0100 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-11-21 13:06 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:48:31 +0100 > > Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 2016-11-21 12:04 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > >> > On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:36:44 +0000 > >> > >> > Can we get support for .doc and .html too? I think these would be great > >> > features. > >> > >> Maybe such comments are not against our policy (that you requested so > >> much), in any case they are not useful. > > > > I do not understand this. Please explain why requesting features is > > against policy or not useful. > > The development mailing list is not the right place for a feature request > (so your email is in fact a policy violation). > > Apart from the fact that doc support does not seem realistic to me: > What would FFmpeg do with the files once it contains a decoder? The same as our teletype decoder does. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
