On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:36:44 +0000 Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 November 2016 at 17:05, Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > > I object to this patch for the reasons Rostislav outlined.. > > > > Kieran > > _______________________________________________ > > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > I actually don't mind the decoder anymore. The code looks simple and neat, > and it would be nice to be able to view the few random psd files I have and > which the decoder can open. No full decoding support is planned, which > would require inhuman effort to complete even like 20% of anyway, so I > doubt the decoder will grow into a huge mess. I mean viewing psd files is a > big pain anyway, so eh, if the decoder can open a few of them and save > people the effort of having gimp (which also doesn't support some psd > features) without being a security disaster it's okay. When you think about > it png is also a mess, its been extended to hell with nonstandard chunks, > but we even have pretty good encoding support for the base of it. Not sure > what the fuss is here, because there's no public standard? Can we get support for .doc and .html too? I think these would be great features. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
