On 10/30/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Am 30.10.2016 um 00:55 schrieb Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >> >>> On 10/30/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Attached patch fixes ticket #5916 for (for example) yuv444p9le. >> >> Same as for another mergeplanes patch from you, please explain why >> this is correct. > > I think that for little endian yuv formats >8bit but <16bit, using the > mergeplanes filter currently implies an intermediate format which must have > the same endianness as the input format but this is not guaranteed by the > current code. > Even if the issue can be worked-around differently, this patch should be > applied anyway imo. > >> Are patches dependend on each other? > > The issue described here can be reproduced (seen) without applying the other > patch, that's what the OP means with "left are strange" in his report on the > bug tracker. > > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
OK, try with non 444 cases, like with 420 high bit depth and if it works apply both patches. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
