> Am 30.10.2016 um 00:55 schrieb Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> On 10/30/16, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Attached patch fixes ticket #5916 for (for example) yuv444p9le.
> 
> Same as for another mergeplanes patch from you, please explain why
> this is correct.

I think that for little endian yuv formats >8bit but <16bit, using the 
mergeplanes filter currently implies an intermediate format which must have the 
same endianness as the input format but this is not guaranteed by the current 
code.
Even if the issue can be worked-around differently, this patch should be 
applied anyway imo.

> Are patches dependend on each other?

The issue described here can be reproduced (seen) without applying the other 
patch, that's what the OP means with "left are strange" in his report on the 
bug tracker.

Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to