On 15/09/2016 23:00, Lukasz Marek wrote:
On 15.09.2016 23:36, Josh de Kock wrote:
On 15/09/2016 22:28, Lukasz Marek wrote:
On 15.09.2016 23:19, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 14:36:32 -0300, James Almer wrote:
* SDL1 is old and effectively unmaintained.

I understand this verbatim, but what is it supposed to mean? Has SDL1
gotten rotten? Or more precisely:

- Has technology evolved, and the library not kept up?
- Is a long list of bugs (somehow effecting ffmpeg) piling up and never
  being fixed?
- Something else?

It doesn't compile on Mac OS

I've been testing it just fine on Mac OS.

I don't remember now everything, I worked with it like 2 years ago,  but
I got the same issue as here
https://forums.libsdl.org/viewtopic.php?p=45264&sid=ae0efc2e82d373067c5112bfba70cd11


Other example is that SDL is trying to use X11 on Mac which is dropped
(since 10.8?).

You can ignore my answer as it doesn't stand for anything. It won't stop
introducing SDL 2.0 nor force 1.2 drop, but asked question if SDL 1.2 is
getting rotten then asnwer is yes IMHO.


SDL1 works absolutely fine on Mac OS, it uses the native window, no X11 required.

--
Josh
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to