2016-08-31 17:35 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at>:
>
> Attached patch fixes ticket #4990 concerning the output file.
> It is possible that there is nothing to fix though, the input
> file is "dirty" and "dupthresh" is not underbid by two visually
> identical frames.

Please ignore, the patch (that I had already had dismissed
myself months ago) is wrong.

The question is still why the user claims his sample is
correctly processed by the original filter and output is
different with FFmpeg's implementation.

Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to