On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:24:35PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > 2016-08-04 16:01 GMT+02:00 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>: > >> So the advantage is that compilation gets measurably faster > >> with your patch? > > > > No, our headers are not the Boost package. i just want to reduce > > dependencies so they don't get recompiled every time you modify > > any of those 10+ unrelated headers or their dependencies. > > If you believe this helps, I can't object.
whats the status of this ? is this droped ? does it need a review ? iam asking due to pachwork showing this as "NEW" without being delegated to anyone. Updating statuses in patchwork is important to keep patchwork effective as a way to keep track of patches ... (it cannot know if a patch was dropped or is still waiting on somethig) thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
