On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 11:22:43AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:24:35PM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Hi! > > > > 2016-08-04 16:01 GMT+02:00 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>: > > >> So the advantage is that compilation gets measurably faster > > >> with your patch? > > > > > > No, our headers are not the Boost package. i just want to reduce > > > dependencies so they don't get recompiled every time you modify > > > any of those 10+ unrelated headers or their dependencies. > > > > If you believe this helps, I can't object. > > whats the status of this ? > > is this droped ? > does it need a review ? > > iam asking due to pachwork showing this as "NEW" without being > delegated to anyone. Updating statuses in patchwork is important to > keep patchwork effective as a way to keep track of patches ... > (it cannot know if a patch was dropped or is still waiting on somethig)
marked the patch as delegated to jamrial (i think thats correct as carl seems to have withdrawn his objection) [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
